Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?

List posts in the topic

Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?

msg# 1.7

depth:

1

Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2011/9/27 1:07

kittin  From: Oregon, USA  Posts: 31

You're welcome. I haven't yet tried to make your latest sl_proxy under cygwin. Would you like me to do that and let you know what issues I run into?

I've been trying to determine how I can tell if sl_cache is still effective for HTTP Textures. As I mentioned, speed is not my concern. I'm looking to reduce bandwidth and I know UDP textures works. I don't know if LL plans to deprecate UDP, but I wouldn't be surprised if they do.

Votes:146 Average:2.88

Posts tree

• New sl_proxy for viewer3? (kittin, 2011/9/18 0:16)
  • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/20 0:32)
  • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/20 12:13)
  • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (kittin, 2011/9/21 1:19)
  • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (kittin, 2011/9/21 13:49)
    • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/21 14:22)
      • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/22 2:11)
        • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/22 14:17)
  • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (kittin, 2011/9/23 11:52)
    • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/24 1:53)
  • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (kittin, 2011/9/26 3:50)
    • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/26 13:36)
  • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (kittin, 2011/9/27 1:07)
    • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/27 10:15)
  • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (kittin, 2011/9/28 2:11)
    • Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/28 10:43)