Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
- depth:
- 1
kittin
From: Oregon, USA
Posts: 31
You're welcome. I haven't yet tried to make your latest sl_proxy under cygwin. Would you like me to do that and let you know what issues I run into?
I've been trying to determine how I can tell if sl_cache is still effective for HTTP Textures. As I mentioned, speed is not my concern. I'm looking to reduce bandwidth and I know UDP textures works. I don't know if LL plans to deprecate UDP, but I wouldn't be surprised if they do.
I've been trying to determine how I can tell if sl_cache is still effective for HTTP Textures. As I mentioned, speed is not my concern. I'm looking to reduce bandwidth and I know UDP textures works. I don't know if LL plans to deprecate UDP, but I wouldn't be surprised if they do.
Votes:134
Average:2.76
Posts tree
-
New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(kittin, 2011/9/18 0:16)
- Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/20 0:32)
- Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/20 12:13)
- Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (kittin, 2011/9/21 1:19)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(kittin, 2011/9/21 13:49)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(iseki, 2011/9/21 14:22)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(iseki, 2011/9/22 2:11)
- Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/22 14:17)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(iseki, 2011/9/22 2:11)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(iseki, 2011/9/21 14:22)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(kittin, 2011/9/23 11:52)
- Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/24 1:53)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(kittin, 2011/9/26 3:50)
- Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/26 13:36)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(kittin, 2011/9/27 1:07)
- Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/27 10:15)
-
Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3?
(kittin, 2011/9/28 2:11)
- Re: New sl_proxy for viewer3? (iseki, 2011/9/28 10:43)